No longer any role for routine follow-up chest x-rays in men with stage I germ cell cancer.

Following radical orchidectomy for testicular cancer, most patients undergo protocolled surveillance to detect tumour recurrences rather than receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Current United Kingdom national and most international guidelines recommend that patients require a chest x-ray (CXR) and serum tumour markers at each follow-up visit as well as regular CT scans; there is however, variation among cancer centres with follow-up protocols. Seminomas often do not cause tumour marker elevation; therefore, CT scans are the main diagnostic tool for detecting relapse. For non-seminomatous tumours, serum beta-HCG (HCG) and AFP levels are a very sensitive harbinger of relapse, but this only occurs in 50% of patients [1], and therefore, imaging remains as important. CXRs are meant to aid in the detection of lung recurrences and before the introduction of modern cross-sectional imaging in the early 1980s, CXRs would have been the only method of identifying lung metastasis. We examined the Thames Valley and Mount Vernon Cancer Centre databases to evaluate the role of CXRs in the 21st century for the follow-up of men with stage I testicular cancer between 2003 and 2015 to assess its value in diagnosing relapsed germ cell tumours. From a total of 1447 patients, we identified 159 relapses. All relapses were detected either by rising tumour markers or planned follow-up CT scans. Not a single relapse was identified on CXR. We conclude that with timely and appropriate modern cross-sectional imaging and tumour marker assays, the CXR no longer has any value in the routine surveillance of stage I testicular cancer and should be removed from follow-up guidelines and clinical practice. Omitting routine CXR from follow-up schedules will reduce anxiety as well as time that patients spend at hospitals and result in significant cost savings.

The relationship between postprandial bile acid concentration, GLP-1, PYY and ghrelin.

BACKGROUND: Gut hormones peptide YY (PYY) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) play an integral role in appetite control and energy homeostasis. Entero-endocrine L-cells can be stimulated by nutrients and or bile acids to co-secrete PYY and GLP-1. The aim of this study was to determine the response of bile acids, PYY, GLP-1 and ghrelin after a test meal. DESIGN: Twelve subjects with a BMI of 22·8 (0·52) kg/m² [mean (SEM)] received a 400 kcal test meal after which blood samples were taken every 30 min from 0 to 180 min. PYY, GLP-1 and ghrelin were measured by radioimmunoassays. Fractionated bile acids were measured by HPLC-MSMS. RESULTS: PYY positively correlated with glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA) (rs = 0·23, P = 0·03) and taurochenodeoxycholic acid (TCDCA) (rs = 0·26, P = 0·02). GLP-1 positively correlated with GCDCA (rs = 0·22, P = 0·047) and glycodeoxycholic acid (GDCA) (rs = 0·3, P = 0·005). Ghrelin negatively correlated with GDCA (rs = -0·45, P≤ 0·0001), TCDCA (rs = -0·23, P = 0·034) and taurodeoxycholic acid (TDCA) (rs = -0·44, P≤ 0·0001). CONCLUSION: PYY and GLP-1 responses correlated with chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) counterparts, whereas ghrelin negatively correlated with deoxycholic acid (DCA) counterparts. Specific bile acids may thus differentially affect entero-endocrine cells.

Postprandial plasma bile acid responses in normal weight and obese subjects.

BACKGROUND: Bile acids can act as signalling molecules via various receptors including the nuclear farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and pregnane X receptor (PXR), and the cell surface G-protein-coupled receptor TGR5. The signalling has been implicated in the release of peptide YY (PYY) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), which improves glycaemic control and energy expenditure. We investigated whether morbidly obese subjects have altered postprandial bile acid responses in comparison to normal weight subjects. METHOD: Blood samples were taken every 30 min from 0 to 180 min following a 400 kcal test meal. Samples were taken from 12 normal weight subjects with a body mass index (BMI) of 23.2 (2.8) kg/m(2) (median [interquartile range (IQR)]) and seven obese patients with a BMI of 47.2 (7.2) kg/m(2). Fractionated bile acids were measured on these samples using high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The obese subjects showed a lower postprandial response in total bile acids compared with the normal weight subjects. An increase of 6.4 (5.0) and 2.6 (3.3) micromol/L (median [IQR]) in normal weight and obese subjects was observed, respectively (P = 0.02). The difference was predominantly due to the glycine-conjugated fraction (P = 0.03). There was no difference in the increase of the unconjugated or taurine-conjugated fractions. CONCLUSIONS: The decreased postprandial bile acid response in obese subjects compared with normal weight subjects may partly explain the suboptimal GLP-1 and PYY responses and could affect appetite, glycaemic control and energy expenditure.

Synergistic activity of trimethoprim and amikacin against gram-negative bacilli.

The in vitro effect of trimethoprim on the inhibitory and bactericidal activity of amikacin against 20 strains each of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Serratia marcescens, 15 strains of Escherichia coli, and 10 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was examined by the checkerboard technique in microtiter plates. Trimethoprim had a synergistic effect on the inhibitory and bactericidal activity of amikacin against the majority of non-pseudomonas strains tested. The mean +/- standard deviation fractional inhibitory concentration indexes were 0.59 +/- 0.19 for the Klebsiella strains, 0.48 +/- 0.18 for the Serratia strains, and 0.60 +/- 0.22 for the E. coli strains tested. Respective mean +/- standard deviation fractional bactericidal concentration indexes for these organisms were 0.55 +/- 0.17, 0.54 +/- 0.29, and 0.61 +/- 0.22. A total of 40% of the Klebsiella strains, 80% of the Serratia strains, and 46% of the E. coli strains had a fractional inhibitory concentration equal to or less than 0.25 for both of these antimicrobial agents and were considered to be synergistically inhibited by the combination. By applying this criterion to bactericidal activity, synergy was demonstrated against 50, 65, and 46% of these strains, respectively. All of the Enterobacteriaceae tested were inhibited by clinically achievable concentrations of trimethoprim and amikacin. Antagonism was not demonstrated with any of the organisms tested. Trimethoprim had no antibacterial effect on the Pseudomonas strains and did not alter amikacin's activity against these bacteria.